Stemming from the frequent observation that cigarette smokers tend to maintain lower body weights than their non-smoking counterparts, it is an intriguing idea that by using a nicotine product (such as a patch or gum), one could experience beneficial body composition effects while avoiding the carcinogenic dangers of cigarette smoke. In this issue of “Chemically Correct,” we take an in-depth look at the science behind one of the world’s most popular drugs.
Despite having similar stimulant qualities, nicotine has a distinct chemical structure from the phenylethylamines such as amphetamine and ephedrine. As opposed to these substances, nicotine is comprised of a pyridine ring connected to a pyrrolidine ring. There are two stereoisomers, (-)—nicotine being the active isomer and having the most affinity for nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (nAChr). Because nicotine is a weak base, it requires an alkaline environment to cross cell membranes (1). This explains the tobacco companies’ use of the controversial “ammonia chemistry” to boost cigarette impact. What makes the chemical structure of nicotine particularly fascinating (or not particularly so, depending how you look at it) is its resemblance to the acetylcholine (ACh) molecule. Because of ACh’s flexibility as a molecule, it can be configured to resemble nicotine. Both the pyridine nitrogen of nicotine and the keto oxygen of ACh are electron donors, while the positive charge of nicotine’s pyrrolidine nitrogen is similar to that of ACh’s nitrogen. Using computer graphics, the two molecules are even super-imposable (2).
Although the pharmacological effects of nicotine span across multiple receptor systems, the primary mode of action is elicited through nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (nAChr’s) (3). These receptors are divided into subunits: alpha2-alpha7 and beta2-beta4. It is known that nicotine binds with the highest affinity to the alpha4beta2 subunit, with an affinity approximately 13 times greater than ACh itself (4). While the alpha4beta2 subunit appears to be responsible for most of nicotine’s pharmacological effects—as determined by the use of genetically altered knockout mice—other subtypes may contribute as well. Particularly, alpha6 and beta3 impact sensitization and reinforcement of nicotine and alpha7 for nicotine’s anti-anxiety effect (5,6). But the pharmacology does not end there, as it’s not merely the nAChr subtype that does all the magic, but rather the cascade of events that occur once that particular subtype is triggered. This includes nicotine’s effects on other neurotransmitter systems.
Dopamine neurons in the ventral tegmental area and the substantia nigra have nAChr’s (particularly the alpha4beta2 and alpha3beta2 subunits) located on their nerve terminal membranes; when these receptors are stimulated, dopamine is secreted (7,8,9,10). Nicotine-evoked glutamate release can enhance such secretion due to the presence of NMDA receptors on the dopamine terminals (11, 12). However, despite such robust dopamine release, overflow of dopamine in areas of the brain like the nucleus accumbens is tightly controlled by the dopamine re-uptake system (13).
In order to overcome such an effect, a dopamine re-uptake inhibitor might prove very useful in potentiating nicotine’s dopaminergic action. But even without a re-uptake inhibitor, chronic use of nicotine by itself can increase dopamine overflow (14), and it is the NMDA receptors that are at least somewhat responsible for this sensitization mechanism (15). Another sensitization mechanism could be induced via nicotine’s upregulation of D1, D2, and D3 receptor mRNA (16,17).
A third mechanism by which dopamine release is sensitized by chronic nicotine treatment is through increased tyrosine hydoxylase expression. Nicotine increases tyrosine hydroxylase mRNA in the brain, as well as the actual tyrosine hydroxylase protein (18). Since tyrosine hydroxylase is the limiting factor in the conversion of L-tyrosine to dopamine, nicotine should result in increased synthesis of dopamine, assuming that L-tyrosine intake is adequate. And indeed, when L-tyrosine and nicotine are administered together in-vitro to human lymphocytes, synthesis of L-Dopa and norepinephrine commences. (19)
Monoamine Oxidase type B (MAO-B) is one of the enzymes responsible for degrading dopamine. It’s been known for some time that cigarette smoke has the capability of irreversibly inhibiting MAO-B (20). And while nicotine metabolite concentration is inversely proportional to MAO-B levels, nicotine itself does not inhibit MAO-B (21). Inhibition of MAO-B compounded by nicotine’s effects on dopamine release is probably one of the primary reasons why cigarettes are so rewarding and might add to their effect on body composition. In order to potentiate nicotine’s dopaminergic action without smoking, one could take the MAO-B inhibitor l-deprenyl. Also, since l-deprenyl has dopamine re-uptake blocking activity (22), it would provide a double mechanism for making nicotine’s effect on dopamine more pronounced.
As with dopamine, nicotine elicits noradrenaline secretion by binding to nAChr’s on noradrenergic neurons (3). Chronic nicotine administration will cause sensitization to its effects on NA release through increased expression of tyrosine hydroxylase (23,18). An indirect mechanism by which nicotine releases NA is through secretion of GABA (24). But that doesn’t make sense, you might assert, as GABA is an inhibitory neurotransmitter, right? Right; but by some unknown mechanism, activation of the GABA-A receptor stimulates NA release (25). Effects of nicotine on GABA will be discussed later.
Eventually, with chronic nicotine infusion, NA overflow is abolished, alluding to the possibility of receptor desensitization (3). Interestingly enough, this phenomenon might add to the reinforcing effects of nicotine use. Because NA release is a component of the response to stressful stimuli (26), halting NA overflow during a stressful situation would explain once more the calming effects of smoking (3, 27).
Nicotine increases the release of serotonin in various parts of the brain, though to a lesser extent than the catecholamines. Mixed evidence exists to whether serotonergic neurons express nAChr’s (28,29). Instead, nicotine induced 5-HT release has been attributed to stimulation of nicotinic receptors located in the dorsal raphe nucleus, and such stimulation appears to be directly responsible for the anxiolytic effects of nicotine (28,30). Serotonin release is controlled by several serotonergic-nicotinic interactions. One such example is that while stimulation of nicotinic receptors leads to 5-HT release (31), stimulation of 5-HT1A receptors will inhibit ACh release (33). Nicotine also increases serotonin transporter density—another inhibitory response to increased 5-HT release (34).
Since this is the case, one might wonder whether it would make sense to add an SSRI to a nicotine regimen? The answer is probably not; sensitization to nicotine’s stimulatory effects has been shown to be blocked by increasing 5-HT levels with the SSRI citalopram, known more commonly as Celexa (35). Finally, in food-deprived rats, tryptophan hydroxylase and serotonin synthesis is upregulated by nicotine (36). This is probably a very important mechanism by which nicotine’s exerts its appetite and weight-controlling effects.
Those who can remember their elementary school D.A.R.E seminar (“Drugs Are Really Expensive” was our favorite interpretation) might recall that nicotine fell under the category of “stimulants.” Such a designation baffled many of us given that most people report they get a calming effect from smoking. So which is it: a stimulant, or a relaxant? So far we’ve mentioned two mechanisms by which nicotine might exert anxiolysis: desensitizing the noradrenergic response to stress and via the increase of serotonin release. The third mechanism by which this may occur is GABAergic in nature. GABAergic neurons express nAChr’s (37), and when stimulated by nicotine increase GABA release (38). Nicotine also decreases the expression of the GABA-B1 receptor, which serves as an inhibitory mechanism on GABA release and thereby minimizes negative feedback (39).
Leptin and Neuropeptide Y
While evidence of increased dopaminergic and serotonergic activity does much to explain nicotine’s effects on body weight and food intake, such a discussion would not be complete without reference to the food intake regulators leptin and neuropeptide Y (NPY). A detailed discussion of these two peptides is beyond the scope of this article; I refer those interested in a comprehensive review of the physiology and function behind these hormones to Par Deus’ “Leptin: The Next Big Thing” series.
It would be wonderful if we could conclude that nicotine raises leptin levels, lowers neuropeptide Y levels, and in turn decreases appetite and body weight. Unfortunately, as is so often the case, nicotine’s effects on these hormones are unclear, and often conflictual. Several studies have demonstrated that smokers have lower leptin levels than non-smokers (40,41,42), while others have established that nicotine raises leptin concentrations (43). In obese rats, nicotine was able to lower bodyweight independent of its effects on leptin levels (44). Such contradictions are somewhat reconciled when we accept that nicotine doesn’t modulate leptin levels per se, but rather increases leptin receptor expression and sensitivity (44,45).
Similar confusions arise with Nicotine’s effects on NPY, as nicotine has been shown to both increase (45) and decrease (46) NPY expression in the hypothalamus. These contradictions are slightly easier to digest when we take into account the conditions in each study. NPY expression decreased under food deprivation and higher nicotine doses (12mg/kg in rats), while it increased with lower doses of nicotine (2-6mg/kg). Interestingly, despite the scenario in which NPY expression was increased, anorectic effects were still prevalent, which suggests that nicotine’s effects on NPY might be the product of a desensitization phenomenon (47).
From a hormonal perspective, nicotine is attractive to male athletes because it can lower estrogen levels by competitively inhibiting the aromatase enzyme (48-52). Also beneficial might be the observation that in dogs, nicotine inhibits 3 alpha-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase, preventing metabolism of DHT to a less potent androgen (53). While theoretically, this would allow one to gain increased benefits from DHT, it might also potentiate DHT’s negative effects on the prostate and hairline.
Unfortunately, beyond individual inhibition of enzymes, nicotine and its metabolite cotinine appear to have a largely negative effect on steroidogenesis. Both nicotine and cotinine have been implicated in decreasing testosterone synthesis in rodent leydig cells (54,55). This decrease might be due to nicotine’s effect on increased ACTH release, leading to increased circulating coritcosteroids, which have been known to alter sex hormone synthesis. While the in vivo action of nicotine on sex steroids might be less pronounced (55), those using nicotine with the purpose of aromatase inhibition should be aware of its other effects on steroidogenesis.
nAChr Desensitization or Upregulation?
In most neurotransmitter systems, chronic administration of an agonist results in receptor desensitization; this is not surprising in view of the body’s tendency towards homeostasis. At first glance, nicotinic receptors appear to be no exception in this regard, given that overnight exposure to nicotine does indeed cause desensitization (59). However, with chronic nicotine exposure, it appears that nicotinic receptors, particularly the alpha4beta2 subtype, undergo what is termed “functional upregulation.” It is proposed that with chronic exposure, the number of high affinity versus low affinity receptors for nicotine actually increases, causing enhanced synaptic transmission of neurotransmitters (60). This upregulation could help elucidate nicotine’s sustained effect on body weight, as well as its addictive qualities.
Mechanisms of Nicotine Addiction
In developed countries, it is estimated that tobacco use is the leading single cause of premature death (63). The irony of this statistic is that in developed countries, we are constantly being badgered about the dangers of tobacco use. In the end, the rewarding characteristics that tobacco and nicotine exert upon our neurochemistry are enough to overpower any voice of reason. So what’s going on here?
Enhancement of dopaminergic activity is considered the universal trademark shared by addictive drugs. When dopamine transmission is impaired, animals will no longer self-administer addictive drugs, including nicotine (64). As we’ve already discussed, nicotine not only causes dopamine release but also increases the concentration of various dopamine receptors and induces glutamate release, sensitizing the dopaminergic response overtime. Add functional upregulation to the mix, and not only is the dopaminergic response to nicotine robust, it only gets better with continued use.
Putting dopamine aside for a minute, often overlooked is the role of serotonin in drug addiction. Serotonin is intimately involved with our ability to feel satiated as well as control impulsive behavior. Depletion of serotonin levels causes an increase in impulsive behavior as well as a tendency to prefer small immediate rewards to larger delayed rewards (65). It is hypothesized that nicotine may cause a shift in the “balance of power” by increasing dopamine function while simultaneously decreasing serotonin function (66). This hypothesis is supported by the observation that in the frontocortio and limbic areas of the brain, chronic nicotine exposure causes increased dopamine and reduced serotonin levels (67).
Related to impulsive behavior are nicotine’s effects on the GABA system, which could theoretically lead to behavioral disinhibition, similar to alcohol. In context, “behavioral disinhibition” means that even when we know we shouldn’t smoke, we reach for the cigarette anyway. The bottom line is that nicotine is so addictive not only because it effectively activates the reward centers of our brain (dopamine), it also partially impairs our decision-making ability through its actions on 5-HT and GABA.
Because the dynamics of nicotine addiction span across more than one receptor system, treatment for nicotine addiction should be just as complex. Despite the fact that SSRI’s by themselves do little to aid in smoking cessation (80), there is some evidence that they might be of benefit when used in conjunction with transdermal nicotine (81). Thus, a complete “shotgun approach” to quitting nicotine (in whatever form) would include the use of proven effective dopaminergics such as bupropion and/or deprenyl (82,83) along with an SSRI.
Two opposing concepts confound the issue of nicotine’s neurotoxicity: nicotine has a protecting effect in Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s disease due to antioxidant properties (68), yet can induce cognitive impairments in the offspring of smoking mothers from oxidative cellular injury (69). So is nicotine neurotoxic? At first glance, it would appear that the answer is yes, since nicotine can decrease glutathione levels and increase oxidative markers such as malondialdehyde, lactate dehydrogenase, hydrogen peroxide, and superoxide ion (69,70). However, evidence of increased oxidative stress is only evident when high dose nicotine is administered (1mM or 162mg and up). Lower dose nicotine appears to have free radical scavenging effects and protects against lipid peroxidation (71). It is also this “lower dose nicotine” (.1mM or 16mg) that most smokers are using, and in these quantities it seems to be protective against Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s disease (72).
Carbon monoxide and other components of cigarette smoke are thought to pose a larger threat to cardiovascular health than nicotine administered on its own (73). However, given nicotine’s stimulant profile, it’s no surprise that it has several cardiovascular effects on its own. By inducing the release of vasopressin, nicotine causes constriction of vascular beds in the skin (74). In other parts of the body, such as skeletal muscle, vasodilation occurs due to increased cardiac output and epinephrine release (75). In animals, nicotine has the ability to increase platelet aggregability, possibly by inhibiting the prostaglandin protacylin, which is an antiplatelet aggregation factor (76,77). While this might appear to pose a threat to cardiovascular health by increasing the risk for blood clots, human snuff users (who generally do not suffer the cardiovascular risks of smokers) show no evidence of platelet activation (77). Similar discrepancies between human and animal studies exist for nicotine’s effect on cholesterol profiles. Squirrel monkeys show increased levels of LDL when administered nicotine (78), while humans do not (79).
Overall, adverse cardiovascular effects stemming from nicotine use derived from sources other than smoking is in humans far from conclusive.
Nicotine Delivery Systems
The nicotine content in cigarettes varies widely depending upon brand, but usually averages around 1mg per cigarette (56). The actual amount absorbed upon smoking will depend upon how the cigarette is smoked, as well as the presence and amount of other added ingredients. Compared to other delivery systems, nicotine levels from cigarettes peak within minutes and fall shortly thereafter. Because the half-life of nicotine is around 2 hours, those who smoke more than one cigarette over the course of a day will demonstrate accumulated nicotine levels in their plasma (1).
It should be noted that the highly addictive quality of cigarettes lies not within its nicotine content, but rather its nicotine pharmacokinetics. Cigarettes provide an immediate jolt of nicotine to the CNS, resulting in almost instant gratification. Delaying nicotine gratification with the use of slower delivery mechanisms should aid minimizing addictive potential.
Oral Snuff and Nicotine Gum
Since both snuff and gum are absorbed from the oral mucosa, they have similar pharmacokinetics. Levels of nicotine peak at 30 minutes and slowly decline over 2 hours. Nicotine gum comes in 2mg and 4mg strengths and has absorption rates of 53% and 72%, respectively (58). Oral snuff tobacco is comprised of approximately 0.4% nicotine (58). Of course, “pinch” size will vary from person to person, but 2.5g caused a peak nicotine level of around 15ng/ml, similar to that of cigarettes and gum (57).
Nicotine patches come in varying strengths, from 14-22mg, delivering nicotine at a constant rate of approximately .9mg per hour; levels peak at anywhere from 4 to 9 hours after initial administration (3).
Nicotine Nasal Spray
Nicotine nasal spray delivers 0.5mg to each nostril in a single dose, and levels peak within 5-10 minutes (3).
Given Nicotine’s pharmacology, it appears to be most useful during periods of intense dieting. By enhancing the actions of dopamine, serotonin and leptin, as well as partially inhibiting the actions of neuropeptide Y, nicotine can partially deceive the body into thinking it is fed—thereby decreasing appetite, mobilizing fat, and preserving lean body mass—even in the presence of a calorie deficit.
So, how would one ideally use nicotine while dieting? From our review of the literature, we know that higher doses are more effective than lower doses at regulating various factors such as neuropeptide Y (47). However, given that these values are based on mg/kg in rats, establishing conversion rates for optimal human usage is a little tricky. Nonetheless, if we return to our original observation that smokers generally weigh less than non-smokers, and suppose that a “smoker” uses approximately 20mg of nicotine a day (about 20 cigarettes, one pack), we can conclude that 20mg might be an appropriate dosage.
It should also be noted that there are a number of other compounds that might compliment a nicotine regimen. Already mentioned has been deprenyl (5-10mg a day), the use of which is aimed at potentiatiating dopaminergic activity. Similarly, caffeine can sensitize the dopaminergic response to nicotine (61). Because nicotine upregulates tyrosine hydroxylase while concurrently inducing catecholamine release, supplementing with L-tyrosine would ensure ample substrates for neurotransmitter formation. Finally, Spook suggested the addition of calcium supplements, as nicotine induces the release of calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP), which can deplete intracellular calcium stores (62).
1. Zevin S, Gourlay S, Benowitz N. Clinical Pharmacology of Nicotine. 1998;16:557-564.
2. Domino E. Tobaco Smoking And Nicotine Neuropsychopharmacology: Some Future Research Directions. Neuropsychopharmacology. 1998;16(8):456-68.
3. Balfour D, Fagerstrom K. Pharmacology of Nicotine and Its Therapeutic Use in Smoking Cessation and Neurodegernerative Disorders. Pharmacol. Ther. 1996;72(1):51-81
4. Gotti C, Fornasari D, Clementi F. Human neuronal nicotinic receptors. Prog Neurobiol 1997; 53: 199-237.
5. Picciotto M, et al. Nicotinic Receptors in the Brain: Links between Molecular Biology and Behavior. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2000;22(5):451-465
6. Cordero-Erausquin M, et al. Nicotinic receptor function: new perspectives from knockout mice. TiPS. 2000;21:211-217
7. Clarke P.B.S., Pert A. Autoradiographic evidence for nicotinic receptors on nigrostriatal and mesolimbic dopaminergic neurons. Brain Res. 1985;248:255-358
8. Rapier C, Lunt G. Wonnacott, S. Stereoselective nicotine-induced release of dopamine from striatal synaptosomes: concentration dependence and repetitive stimulation. J Neurochem. 1988;50:1123-1130
9. Kaiser SA, Wonnacott S. Nicotinic receptor modulation of neurotransmitter release. In: Americ, Sp.P., Brioni, J.D. (Eds.), Neuronal Nicotinic Receptors: Pharmacology and Therapeutic Oppurtunities., 1998; Vol. 8, Wiley-Liss, New York, NY, pp. 141-159
10. Kulak JM, Nguyen TA, Olivera BM, McIntosh JM. Alpha-conotoxin MII blocks nicotine-stimulated dopamine release in rat striatal synaptosomes. J. Neurosci. 1997;17: 5263-5270
11. Wonnacott S, Kaiser S, Mogg A, Soliakov L, Jones I. Presynaptic nicotinic receptors modulating dopamine release in the rat striatum. European Journal of Pharmacology. 2000;393:51-58
12. Cheramy A, Godeheu G, L’Hirondel M, Glowinski J. Cooperative contributions of cholinergic and NMDA receptors in the presynaptic control of dopamine release from synaptosomes of the rat striatum. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 1996;276:616-625
13. Garris PA, Wightman RM. Different kinetics govern dopaminergic transmission in the amygdale, prefrontal cortex and striatum: an in vivo valtammetric study. J. Neurosci. 14:442-450
14. Benwell MEM, Balfour DJK. The effects of acute and repeated nicotine treatment on nucleus accubens dopamine and locomotor activity. Br. J. Pharmacol. 1992;105:849-856
15. Shoaib M, Benwell MEM, Akbar MT, Stolerman IP, Balfour DJK. Behavioural and neurochemical adaptations to nicotine in rats: influence of NMDA antagonists. Br. J. Pharmacol. 1994;111:1073-1080
16. Bahk J, Li S, Park M, Kim M. Dopamine D1 and D2 receptor mRNA up-regulation in the caudate-putamen and nucleus accumbens of rat brains by smoking. Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology & Biological Psychiatry. 2002;26:1095-1104
17. Le Foll B, Schwartz JC, Sokoloff P. Disruption of nicotine conditioning by dopamine D(3) receptor ligands. Mol Psychiatry 2003 Reb;8(2):225-30
18. Smith KM, Mitchell SN, Joseph MH. Effects of chronic and subchronic nicotine on tyrosine hydroxylase activity in noradrenergic and dopaminergic neurons in the rat brain. J. Neurochem. 1991;57:1750-1756
19. Musso N, Benci S, Indiveri F, Lotti G. L-tyrosine and nicotine induce synthesis of L-Dopa and norepinephrine in human lymphocytes. Journal of Neuroimmunology. 1997;74:117-120
20. Fowler JS, Volkow ND, Wang GJ, Pappas N, Logan J, MacGregor R, Alexoff D, Shea C, Schlyer D, Wolf AP, Warner D, Zezulkova I, Cilento R. Inhibition of monoamine oxidase B in the brains of smokers. Nature 1996 Feb 22;379(6567):733-6
21. Berlin I, Spreux-Varoquaux O, Launay JM. Platelet monoamine oxidase B activity is inversely associated with plasma cotinine concentration. Nicotine Tob Res 2000 Aug;2(3):243-6
22. Lamensdorf I, Porat S, Simantov R, Finberg JP. Effect of low-dose treatment with selegiline on dopamine transporter (DAT) expression and amphetamine-induced dopamine release in vivo. Br J Pharmacol 1999 Feb; 126(4):997-1002
23. Mitchell SN, Brazell MP, Joseph MH, Alavijeh MS, Gray JA. Regionally specific effects of acute and chronic nicotine on rate of catecholamine and 5-hydroxytryptamine synthesis in rat brain. Eu. J. Pharmacol. 1989;167:311-322
24. Leslie FM, Gallardo KA, Park MK. Nicotinic acetylcholine receptor-mediated release of [3H]norepinephrine from developing and adult rat hippocampus: direct and indirect mechanisms. Neuropharmacology. 2002;42:653-651.
25. Bonanno G, Raiteri M. Release-regulating GABAA receptors are present on noradrenergic nerve terminals in selective area of the rat brain. Synapse. 1987;1:254-257
26. Abercrombie EB, Jacobs BL. Single unit response of noradrenergic neurons in the locus coeruleus of freely moving cats 1. Actutely presented stressful and non-stressful stimuli. J. Neurosci. 7:2837-2843.
27. Gilbert DG. Paradoxical tranquilizing and emotion-reducing effects of nicotine. Psychol. Bull. 86:643-661.
28. Seth P, Cheeta S, Tucci S, File S. Nicotinic-serotonergic interactions in brain and behaviour. Pharmacology, Biochemistry and Behavior. 2002;71:793-805
29. Reuben M, Clarke P. Nicotine-evoked [3H]5-hydroxytryptamine release from rat striatal synaptosomes. Neuropharmacology. 2000;30:290-299.
30. Schwartz RD, Lehman J, Kellar KJ. Presynaptic nicotinic cholinergic receptors labeled by [3H]acetylcholine on catecholamine and serotonin axons in brain. J Neurochem 1984;42:1495-8.
31. Cheeta S, Irvine EE, Kenny PJ, File SE. The dorsal raphe nucleus is a crucial structure mediating nicotine’s anxiolytic effects and the development of tolerence and withdrawal responses. Psychopharmacology. 2001a;155:78-85.
32. Lendvai B, et al. Figgrtrnyisl mrvhsnidmd involbrf in yhr rggrvy og nivoyiniv shonidyd DMPP and lobeline to release [3H]5-HT from rat hippocampal slices. Neuropharmacology. 1996;35:1769-77.
33. Rada PV, Mark GP, Hoebel BG. In vivo modulation of acetylcholine in the nucleus accumbens of freely moving rats: I. Inhibition by serotonin. Brain Res. 1993;619:98-104.
34. Muneoka K, Ogawa T, Kamei K, Muraoka S, Tomiyoshi R, Mimura Y, Kato H, Suzuko MR, Takigawa M. Nicotine exposure during pregnancy is a factor which influences seotonin transporter density in the rat brain. Eur J Pharmacol. 2001;411:279-82.
35. Olausson P, Engel JA, Soderpalm B. Behavioral sensitization to nicotine is associated with behavioral disinhibition; counteraction by citalopram. Psychopharmacology 1999;142:111-9.
36. Lee T, Jang M, Shin M, Lim B, Choi H, Kim H, Kim E, Kim C. Nicotine administration increases serotonin synthesis and tryptophan hydroxylase expression in dorsal raphe of food-deprived rats. Nutrition Research. 2002;22:1445-1452.
37. Frazier CJ, Rollins YD, Breese CR, Leonard S, Freedman R, Dunwiddie TV. Acetylcholine activates an alpha-bungarotoxin-sensitive nicotinic current in rat hippocampal interneurons, but not pyramidal cells. J. Neurosci. 1998;18:1187-95.
38. Alkondon M, Pereira EF, Barbosa CT, Aluquerque EX. Neuronal nicotinic acetylcholine receptor activation modulates gamma-aminobutyric acid release from CA1 neurons of rat hippocampal slices. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 1997;283:1396-1411.
39. Li S, Park M, Bahk J, Kim M. Chronic nicotine and smoking exposure decreases GABAb1 receptor expression in the rat hippocampus. Neuroscience Letters. 2002;334:135-9.
40. Wei M, Stern MP, Haffner SM. Serum leptin levels in Mexican Americans and non-Hispanic whites: association with body mass index and cigarette smoking. Ann Epidemiol 1997;7:81.
41. Hodge AM, Westerman RA, de Courten MP, et al. Is leptin sensitivity the link between smoking cessation and weight gain? Int J Obes Rel Metab Disord 1997;21:50.
42. Mantzoros CS, Liolios AD, Tritos NA, et al. Circulating insulin concentrations, smoking, and alcohol intake are important independent. Obes Res. 1998;6:179
43. Eliasson B, Smith U. Leptin levels in smokers and long-term users of nicotine gum. Eur J Clin Invest. 1999;29:145.
44. Sanigorski A, Fahey R, Cameron-Smith D, Collier GR. Nicotine treatment decreases food intake and body weight via a leptin-independent pathway in Psammomys obesus. Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism. 2002;3:346-50.
45. Li MD, Kane JK, Parker SL, McAllen K, Matta SG, Sharp BM. Nicotine administration enhances NPY expression in the rat hypothalamus. Brain Research. 2000;867:157-64.
46. Jang MH, Shin MC, Kim KH, Cho SY, Bahn GH, Kim EH, Kim CJ. Nicotine administration decreases neuropeptide Y expression and increased leptin receptor expression in the hypothalamus of food deprived rats. Brain Research. 2003;964:311-15.
47. Levin BE, Keesey RE. Defense of differing body weight set points in diet-induced obese and resistant rats. Am J Physiol. 1998;274:R412.
48. Kadohama, N., K. Shintani, and Y. Osawa, Tobacco alkaloid derivatives as inhibitors of breast cancer aromatase. Cancer Lett, 1993. 75(3): p. 175-182.
49. Bullion, K., S. Ohnishi, and Y. Osawa, Competitive inhibition of human placental aromatase by N-n- octanoylnornicotine and other nornicotine derivatives. Endocr Res, 1991. 17(3-4): p. 409-419.
50. Osawa, Y., et al., Aromatase inhibitors in cigarette smoke, tobacco leaves and other plants. J Enzyme Inhib, 1990. 4(2): p. 187-200.
51. Barbieri, R.L., P.M. McShane, and K.J. Ryan, Constituents of cigarette smoke inhibit human granulosa cell aromatase. Fertil Steril, 1986. 46(2): p. 232-236.
52. Barbieri, R.L., J. Gochberg, and K.J. Ryan, Nicotine, cotinine, and anabasine inhibit aromatase in human trophoblast in vitro. J Clin Invest, 1986. 77(6): p. 1727-1733.
53. Meikle AW, Liu XH, Taylor GN, Stringham JD. Nicotine and cotinine effects on 3 alpha hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase in canine prostate. Life Sci 1988;43(23):1845-50.
54. Patterson TR, Stringham JD, Meikle AW. Nicotine and cotinine inhibit steroidogensis in mouse leydig cells. Life Sciences. 1990;46:265-72.
55. Sarasin A, Schlumpf M, Muller M, Fleischmann I, Lauber M, Lichtensteiger W. Adrenal-mediated rather than direct effects of nicotine as a basis of altered sex steroid synthesis in fetal and neonatal rat. Reproductive Toxicology. 2003;17:153-62.
56. Jarvis M, et al. Nicotine yield from machine-smoked cigarettes and nicotine intakes in smokers: evidence from a representative population survey. Journal of the National Cancer Institute:93;134-138.
57. Benowitz NL, Porchet H, Sheiner L, et al. Nicotine absorption and cardiovascular effects with smokeless tobacco use: comparison with cigarettes and nicotine gum. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1988;44:23-8.
58. Benowithz NL, Jacob PI, Savanapridi C. Determinants of nicotine intake while chewing nicotine polacrilex gum. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1987;41:467-73.
59. Peng X, et al. Nicotine-induced increase in neuronal nicotinic receptors results from a decrease in the rate of receptor turnover. Mol. Pharmacol. 1999;46:523-30.
60. Buisson B, Bertrand D. Nicotine addiction: the possible role of functional upregulation. Trends in Pharmacological Sciences. 2002;23:130-5.
61. Tanda G, Goldberg SR. Alteration of the Behavioral Effects of Nicotine by Chronic Caffeine Exposure. 2000;66:47-64.
62. Ishikawa M, Ouchi Y, Orimo H. Effect of calcitonin gene-related peptide on cytosolic free Ca2+ level in vascular smooth muscle. Eur J Pharmacol. 1993 Jul 15;246(2):121-8.
63. Peto R, Lopez AD, Borcham J, Thun M, Heath C. Mortality from tobacco in developed countries: indirect estimation from national vital statistics. Lancet. 1992;339:1268-678.
64. Balfour , DJ, Wright, AE, Benwell, ME and Birrell, CE, 2000. The putative role of extra-synaptic mesolimbic dopamine in the neurobiology of nicotine dependence. Behav Brain Res 113, pp.
65. Hollander, E and Rosen, J, 2000. Impulsivity. J Psychopharmacol 14, pp. S39–S44.
66. Peter Olausson, Jörgen A. Engel and Bo Söderpalm, Involvement of serotonin in nicotine dependence: Processes relevant to positive and negative regulation of drug intake, Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior, Volume 71, Issue 4, April 2002, Pages 757-771.
67. Kirch , DG, Gerhardt, GA, Shelton, RC, Freedman, R and Wyatt, RJ, 1987. Effect of chronic nicotine administration on monoamine and monoamine metabolite concentrations in rat brain. Clin Neuropharmacol 10, pp. 376–383.
68. Linert W, Bridge MH, Huber M, Bjugstad KB, Grossman S, Arendash GW. In vitro and in vivo studies invgestigating possible antioxidant actions of nicotine: relevance to Parkinson’s and Alzheimer’s diseases. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 1999;1454:143-52.
69. Yildiz D, Liu YS, Ercal N, Armstrong DW. Comparison of pure nicotine- and smokeless tobacco extract-unduced toxicities and oxidative stress. Arch Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 1999;37:434-9.
70. Gvozdjakova A, Kucharska J, Gvozdjak J. Effect of smoking on the oxidative processes of cardiomyocytes. Cardiology. 1992;81:81-4.
71. Guan ZZ, Yu WF, Nordberg A. Dual effects of nicotine on oxidative stress and neuroprotection in PC12 cells. Neurochemistry International. 2003;43:243-9.
72. Graves AB, Mortimer JA. Does smoking reduce the risks of Parkinson’s and Alzheimer’s disease? J Smoking-Related Dis. 1994;5:79-90
73. Mahmarian JJ, Moye LA, Nasser GA, et al. A strategy of smoking cessation combined with nicotine patch therapy reduces the extent of exercise induced myocardial ischemia. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1997;30:125-30.
74. Waeber B, Schaller M, Nussberger J, Bussien J, Hofbauer KG, Brunner HR. Skin blood flow reduction induced by cagarette smoking: role of vasopressin. Am J Physiol. 1984;249:895-901.
75. Kool MJF, Hocks APG, Struijker Boudier HAJ, Reneman RS, Van Bortel LMAB. Short- and long-term effects of smoking on arterial wall properties in habitual smokers. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1993;22:1881-6.
76. Becker BG, Terres W, Kratzer M, Gerlach E. Blood platelet function after chronic treatment of rats and guinea pigs with nicotine. Klin Wochenschr. 1988;66: Suppl XI:28-36.
77. Wennmalm A, Benthin G, Granstrom EF, Persson L, Peterson A, Winnell S. Relation between tobacco use and urinary excretion of thomboxane A2 and protacylcin metabolites in young men. Circulation. 1991;83:1698-704.
78. Cluette-Brown J, Mulligan J, Doyle K, Hagan S, Osmolski T, Hojnacki J. Oral nicotine induces an artherogenic lipoprotein profile. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med. 1986;37:529-533.
79. Thomas GAO, Davies SV, Rhodes J, Russell MAH, Feyerabend C, Sawe U. Is transdermal nicotine associated with cardiovascular risk? J R Coll Physicians Lond. 1995;29:392-6.
80. Sellers , EM, Naranjo, CA and Kadlec, K, 1987. Do seretonin uptake inhibitors decrease smoking? Observations in a group of heavy drinkers. J Clin Psychopharmacol 7, pp. 417–420.
81. Killen , JD, Fortmann, SP, Schatzberg, AF, Hayward, C, Sussman, L, Rothman, M, Strausberg, L and Varady, A, 2000. Nicotine patch and paroxetine for smoking cessation. J Consult Clin Psychol 68, pp. 883–889.
82. Martinez-Raga J, Keaney F, Sutherland G, Perez-Galvez B, Strang J. Treatment of nicotine dependence with bupropion SR: review of its efficacy, safety and pharmacological profile. Addict Biol. 2003 Mar;8(1):13-21
83. Houtsmuller EJ, Thornton JA, Stitzer ML. Effects of selegiline (L-deprenyl) during smoking and short-term abstinence. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 2002 Sep;163(2):213-20.